Minding the Gap: Annotation as preparation for discussion
SMC Affiliated Work
School of Liberal Arts
Publication / Conference / Sponsorship
Arts and Humanities in Higher Education
This research project examines classroom discussion in its relationship to reading as made visible through the practice of textual annotation. In order to develop a rich description of student reading/discussion processes, we targeted multiple undergraduate seminars at a liberal arts college as they encountered the first two Acts of Shakespeare’s King Lear . We collected triangulated data from these class sessions including targeted reading surveys, student reading annotations, natural- istic observation of real-time seminar discussion behavior, and student reflections. Our analysis of the students’ annotations relies upon reading theorist Wolfgang Iser’s conceptions of interpretive gap, consistency building, and individual reper- toire. Our discussion considers the theoretical implications of this local, in-depth data for the broader analysis of student reading and discussion practices.
annotation, difficulty, discussion, pedagogy, reading, student readers
Arts and Humanities
Feito, Jose & Donahue, Patricia. (2008). Minding the Gap: Annotation as preparation for discussion. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 7(3), 295-307.
Feito, Jose and Donahue, Patricia. Minding the Gap: Annotation as preparation for discussion (2009). Arts and Humanities in Higher Education. 7 (3), 295-307. [article]. https://digitalcommons.stmarys-ca.edu/school-liberal-arts-faculty-works/802