SMC Affiliated Work
1
Status
Faculty
School
School of Economics and Business Administration
Department
Organizations and Responsible Business
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2018
Publication / Conference / Sponsorship
Journal of Management Inquiry
Description/Abstract
How do actors in positions of authority attempt to justify their right to rule while introducing controversial institutional practices that potentially delegitimate their authority? China’s reform leaders have found themselves in a legitimacy conundrum when they established and developed the stock market, yet have been able to assert a central role for the party-state in managing the stock market. Using a critical rhetorical perspective, we analyze how actors use “rhetorical genres,” that is, argumentation and narration with differing content and style, to construct new roles of the speaker and speaker–audience relationships that imply new bases of authority, and how these rhetorical genres can be conceptualized as “discursive spaces” that could accommodate contradictions in the rhetorical situations characterized by polarization in ideologies and interests.
Keywords
institutional theory, legitimacy, communication, content analysis, qualitative research
Scholarly
yes
Peer Reviewed
1
DOI
10.1177/1056492616682620
Volume
27
Issue
1
First Page
69
Last Page
95
Disciplines
Business | Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics | Economics | Organizational Behavior and Theory
Rights
Open Access. Author Manuscript. Author permission to post in Saint Mary’s Digital Commons
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Original Citation
Li, Y., Green, S., & Hirsch, P. (2018). Rhetoric and authority in a polarized transition: The development of China’s stock market. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(1), 69-95.
Repository Citation
Li, Yuan; Green, Sandy E.; and Hirsch, Paul M.. Rhetoric and Authority in a Polarized Transition: The Development of China’s Stock Market (2018). Journal of Management Inquiry. 27 (1), 69-95. 10.1177/1056492616682620 [article]. https://digitalcommons.stmarys-ca.edu/school-economics-business-faculty-works/330
Link to Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492616682620
Included in
Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics Commons, Economics Commons, Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons