A comparison of functional behavior assessment methodologies with young children: Descriptive methods and functional analysis
SMC Affiliated Work
1
Status
Faculty
School
Kalmanovitz School of Education
Department
Teacher Education
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2008
Publication / Conference / Sponsorship
Journal of Behavior Education
Description/Abstract
The use of functional behavior assessment (FBA) to guide the development of behavior intervention plans continues to increase since they were first mandated in IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. Section 1400 et seq, 1997). A variety of indirect and direct instruments have been developed to facilitate this process. Although many researchers believe that a full functional analysis is necessary to identify the function of a behavior, more rapid and efficient FBA procedures are more commonly used. This investigation examined the correspondence between indirect and direct FBA procedures. Specifically, the results of three descriptive assessments and a functional analysis for four young children at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders were compared. Separation of all descriptive and experimental results was maintained and the assessment order was counterbalanced. Results of the descriptive assessments had low consistency with each other, and the results of two indirect FBA assessments (the Functional Assessment Interview and Motivation Assessment Scale) had low agreement with the results of functional analyses. On the other hand, the direct assessment procedure (ABC assessment) agreed with the results of functional analyses for all participants. These results support the use of direct observations and indicate that indirect measures should be used with caution as stand-alone assessments of the function of challenging behaviors.
Keywords
Functional behavior assessment, Descriptive assessments, Functional analysis, Young children, Emotional and behavioral disorders
Scholarly
yes
Peer Reviewed
1
DOI
10.1007/s10864-008-9064-3
ISSN
1053-0819
Volume
17
First Page
200
Last Page
219
Disciplines
Education
Original Citation
Alter, P.J. Conroy, M.A., Mancil, G.R. & Haydon, T. (2008). A comparison of functional behavior assessment methodologies with young children: Descriptive methods and functional analysis. Journal of Behavior Education 17, 200-219. 10.1007/s10864-008-9064-3. 1053-0819.
Repository Citation
Alter, Peter; Conroy, Maureen A.; Mancil, G. Rich; and Haydon, Todd. A comparison of functional behavior assessment methodologies with young children: Descriptive methods and functional analysis (2008). Journal of Behavior Education. 17, 200-219. 10.1007/s10864-008-9064-3 [article]. https://digitalcommons.stmarys-ca.edu/school-education-faculty-works/440